PROFESSIONAL CONTEXT - CROSSING BOUNDARIES

Andrews (1990) defines interdisciplinary collaboration as occurring "when different professionals, possessing unique knowledge, skills, organizational perspectives, and personal attributes, engage in coordinated problem solving for a common purpose" (cited in Berg-Weger &. Schneider, 1998).

My Interdisciplinary Connections Padlet. For a better view follow this link:

https://padlet.com/janice_potts17/ptalcmst9fhl


Interestingly, as I consider all my current interdisciplinary connections, my Padlet became quite a large arrangement. I also noticed that it is impossible to act as an independent. My current interdisciplinary connections and the CoPs I identify with, are interwoven. There are so many connections that we create to enable us to do our job properly that I have unconsciously adopted an interdisciplinary approach.

Benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary practice in relation to my identified connections:

The key benefit is that of mutual respect whist giving our learners the 21st Century learning values that are the common goals of all educators. Those identified in my connections mostly collaborate, communicate, share resources, develop new skills, show enthusiasm, work on a trust model and have a shared vision. All of these attributes contribute towards our common goal of helping my learners to succeed. A challenge might be the possibility of compromised relationships. As with children working on a common inquiry project, if the relationships are broken, the outcomes will be lessened.

Benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary practice in relation to my near future goal:

My near future goal is: the 'shift' to successful interdisciplinary collaboration in an ILE in 2018, through implementing STEAM.                                                                 
Schroeder, Scott, Tolson, Huang, & Lee (2007), state that “A broad examination of trends in mathematics and science education reveals numerous calls for interdisciplinary mathematics and science in classrooms as a potential means to increase engagement.” I know from my own experiences implementing; SOLO, Blooms Taxonomy, collaborative units of work, Six Thinking Hats, Thinkers Keys, Inquiry learning and completing Infinity Maps, that my pupil’s level of engagement is far greater than learning about a specific topic and then memorising the information relating to it. The Ross Curriculum, gives a perfect example of the interconnections of interdisciplinary learning (Figure 1). The positives include; creativity, positivity, enthusiasm, relevance, higher levels of interest, critical thinking, problem solving and generally deeper understandings. There are also many other bodies of research that confirm that interdisciplinary collaboration will give our students the skills they need to find employment in a world with a greater population, global interconnections, technological advancements and more problems than ever before.
Figure 1. The Ross Curriculum Spiral.

When watching the video: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Science (2015, July 5), I noticed the thoughtful comments made by the learners at The Ross Institute cemented the whole concept of interdisciplinary practice.

Comments from the pupils at the Ross Institute.

STEAM education links with interdisciplinary collaboration as it promotes the teaching of how all things relate to each other. As teachers, we need to collaborate to make decisions on what this learning journey will ‘look like’ for our students. For it to be successful, we will require some PD to ‘unwrap’ the pedagogy of both STEAM and ILE teaching. Our learning needs to be evidence and research based. We will also need time to plan together and set goals. Mulligan, L. M., & Kuban, A. J. (2015) have developed a conceptual model for interdisciplinary collaboration (Figure 2) which shows that if the three elements come together, then successful collaboration can occur. I feel confident that the teachers selected to work together have the interpersonal skills, intrapersonal skills, shared language, mind-set and range of abilities to create a new CoP, to independently meet and discuss the learning and teaching opportunities ahead to successfully pursue this journey, creating positive interdisciplinary learning experiences for our students. Conversely, if we don’t have the interdisciplinary mind-sets to collaborate, and some or all of elements in the conceptual model for interdisciplinary collaboration (Mulligan, L. M., & Kuban, A. J., 2015) have become compromised, then the potential of this exciting new learning journey might not be as effective.
Figure 2. Mulligan, L. M., & Kuban, A. J. (2015) A conceptual model for   interdisciplinary collaboration. 
I have been awarded a TeachNZ study award for 2018. This will allow me to complete my Bachelor's Degree in Education. Upon my return to the classroom in 2019, I look forward to applying the practice of interdisciplinary collaboration in a STEAM environment. During 2018, my colleagues will have gained valuable insights into the implementation of a STEAM programme in an ILE. I look forward to slotting back in to the CoP to play my part.
REFERENCES:

ITL Research. (2012). 21CLD Learning Activity Rubrics. Retrieved from: https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research

Mulligan, L. M., & Kuban, A. J. . (2015). A Conceptual Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Retrieved from: http://acrlog.org/2015/05/14/a-conceptual-model-for-interdisciplinary-collaboration/

Padlet. Retrieved from: https://padlet.com


Ross Institute. (2015, July 5). Ross Spiral Curriculum: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Science. [video file]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHZhkB0FJik

Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y. and Lee, Y.-H. (2007), A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Retrieved from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.20212/full

The Ross Spiral Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.rosslearningsystem.org/curriculum/


Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 21, 2017 at 5:33 PM

    I think there are many factors that could affect the 'compromises' you talk about... as theories are exactly that (and ideal in what they aim to achieve), the real test is when the rubber meets the road, and concerns the integrity of the individuals who make up the collaboration. Certainly the 3 faceted conceptual model (Mulligan & Kuban, 2015) outlines many aspects to this strong interdisciplinary model. In other ways, if you took away the academic articles, I would argue that this is clearly not a new concept, and we could consider that this approach is the direction we would be heading in anyway, through learning by experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Janice POctober 21, 2017 at 9:39 PM

      Thanks Sarah. I agree with you in that interdisciplinary collaboration is not new. On reflection though, it is a model that I think will have the most benefits for our learners and their future pathways. Times are changing and we need to be prepared to embrace that or be left behind. Leaving young people who may not be as prepared as they should be.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REFLECTIVE PRACTICE

Image
Finlay (2008) stated that to be a powerful tool to examine and transform practice, critical reflection needed to be refined and grown. After completing the reflective practice survey and considering the 5 levels of reflection as defined by Zeichner & Liston (1996), my current reflective practice is at the Rapid Reflection and Repair level. I need to shift to Research and Retheorizing and Reformulating to refine and grow my practice. Firstly, I selected a suitable model of reflection to augment the quality of my reflective practice. Finlay (2008) discusses a variety of reflective practice models; Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle (1988), The three-stage model of Boud, Keogh and Walker (1985) and John’s Model of Structured Reflection (2006). I have selected Jay and Johnson’s (2002) model as the three intertwined dimensions of; descriptive, comparative and critical reflection are more consistent with the Spiral Model of Inquiry where it cycles through: scanning – focussing – develo...
Read more

SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE COMMUNITY, SCHOOL CULTURE AND PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTS.

Image
A ‘decile’ as defined by the Ministry of Education, school-decile-ratings (2017) “is a measure of the socio-economic position of a school’s student community relative to other schools throughout the country.” The decile rating attracts operational funding and resources. Deciles are calculated against the socio-economic indicators of income, occupation, household crowding, educational qualifications and  families receiving income support.                                                                                                                                Our school is decile 5. We have parents who are well educated, drive new cars and travel overseas r...
Read more

INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CULTURAL RESPONSIVENESS.

Image
To understand indigenous knowledge, people need to accumulate their own personal understanding of ‘culture’. Yes, it is the characteristics of a group of people, their music, dance, food and art. However, it is so much more. When applying the Mauri Model, I consider myself as sitting at the Mauri Ora level, the state of being actively engaged. My cultural framework is strong. I do not take on the perceptions of others, I have an open mind and develop my own understandings by being a listener and an observer. Gay (2010) defines culturally responsive pedagogy as teaching ‘to and through students’ personal and cultural strengths, their intellectual capabilities, and their prior accomplishments’ (p. 26). I believe this is the case, the bottom line. To be an effective cultural facilitator, you need to consider where you sit in relation to the Nine Cultural Intelligence Mega Skills, as identified by Bucher (2008). On reflection, I can check off numbers 1 to 8. A key contributin...
Read more